ArticleFrontiers in stroke2026
A prospective study evaluating clopidogrel resistance among patients with ischemic cerebrovascular events across different ethnic groups in Israel.
Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clopidogrel is commonly used for secondary prevention after ischemic cerebrovascular events, but substantial interindividual variability in pharmacodynamics response has been reported. Individuals demonstrating resistance to clopidogrel face a higher likelihood of recurrent ischemic events. This study evaluated clopidogrel responsiveness among Jewish and Arab patients treated within the same regional healthcare setting. Methods: This prospective cohort included 102 patients with ischemic cerebrovascular events (acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack) receiving clopidogrel for secondary prevention. Patients received either a loading dose (300 in 62 patients, 600 mg in 1 patient) followed by maintenance therapy or at least 7 days of 75 mg daily maintenance dosing ( Results: The study included 102 enrolled patients, of whom 57 (55.9%) were Jewish and 45 (44.1%) were Arab. A valid VASP-PRI measurement was available for 101 patients (57 Jewish and 44 Arab); one Arab patient had no evaluable PRI measurement. Therefore, analyses of platelet reactivity were based on 101 patients The median PRI for all patients was 65.5 (49.1-80.3), with no statistically significant differences between Jewish and Arab ( Conclusions: A high proportion of patients demonstrated elevated residual platelet reactivity according to the operational PRI threshold used in this study. No statistically significant ethnic difference in PRI was detected; however, the ethnic comparison was exploratory and the study was not powered to exclude modest between-group differences. Larger prospective studies incorporating CYP2C19 genotyping and longitudinal clinical outcomes are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.