ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Peripheral vision as a key factor for decision-making in soccer.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral vision is critical for processing dynamic visual information in team sports such as soccer; however, yet little is known about how individual differences in peripheral visual field extent relate to decision-making efficiency under time pressure. This study investigated whether peripheral visual field size is associated with decision-making performance in soccer players while controlling for competitive level. Forty male soccer players (age: 21.65 ± 3.92 years) completed a peripheral vision assessment using a BlazePod system positioned at eccentricities ranging from 60° to 100°, while maintaining central fixation under eye-tracking control. Decision-making performance was assessed using 22 video-based soccer scenarios (presented twice) that required rapid pass/no-pass decisions. A composite performance ratio integrating decision accuracy and decision time served as the primary outcome. Partial correlation analyses, controlling for playing level, revealed a significant positive association between peripheral visual field extent and the performance ratio. This relationship was more strongly reflected in faster decision times, whereas the association with decision accuracy was weaker. These findings suggest that a larger peripheral visual field is associated with more efficient decision-making in soccer, largely due to reduced response times rather than improved accuracy. Peripheral visual capacity may therefore contribute uniquely to perceptual-cognitive performance beyond competitive level and could represent a potential target for future training interventions in time-constrained sport settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.