ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Caregiver perceptions of telemedicine in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: a nationwide Spanish survey.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) require intensive and multidisciplinary care. Telemedicine has emerged as a potential tool to improve access and reduce burden for caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs), but its acceptance and perceived value in severe epilepsies among caregivers and HCPs remain unclear. Methods: Two online surveys (August-November 2024) targeted caregivers of Spanish patients with DEEs and HCPs treating patients with DEEs practicing in Spain. Due to low HCP response ( Results: Caregivers (98% parents, 78% female) reported high healthcare demands and a preference for increased medical contact. Half used telemedicine, mainly telephone (47%) or email (20%), but satisfaction was significantly lower than with in-person care (mean 3.2 vs. 4.6 on 5-point scale; Discussion: Among caregivers of patients with DEEs, telemedicine was valued for its logistical benefits but not considered clinically equivalent, particularly for rehabilitative therapies and physical examination. These results should be interpreted cautiously, as telemedicine use in our sample relied predominantly on telephone and email, with very limited adoption of videoconferencing, the standard modality in neurological telemedicine, which restricts conclusions about its clinical equivalence. Tailored hybrid models preserving in-person high-complexity care and improved digital strategies are needed to address caregiver expectations and service-specific requirements. Findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.