ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2026
An Explainable Self-Supervised Temporal Transformer for Participant-Level Classification of Depressive Symptoms From Resting-State EEG.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResting-state electroencephalography (EEG) has emerged as a promising non-invasive modality for investigating depressive symptoms; however, conventional deep-learning methods often require large labeled datasets and provide limited interpretability. We developed an Explainable Self-Supervised Temporal Transformer Network for participant-level classification of BDI-defined elevated depressive symptoms from resting-state EEG.
methodsThe framework employed masked temporal modeling for self-supervised pretraining followed by supervised fine-tuning. Model performance was evaluated using repeated nested participant-wise cross-validation and compared with conventional machine-learning and deep-learning baselines. Explainability was investigated through transformer attention maps and SHAP-based channel attribution.
resultsThe proposed model achieved a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.90), a precision-recall AUC of 0.69, balanced accuracy of 0.75, sensitivity of 0.72, and specificity of 0.78. The positive predictive value was 0.57, indicating a substantial false-positive burden in the evaluated cohort. The proposed model showed the highest point-estimate ROC-AUC among the evaluated baselines, with a 0.07 improvement over EEGNet; however, the overlapping uncertainty intervals and the small elevated-symptom cohort warrant cautious interpretation of comparative superiority. Performance decreased from an ROC-AUC of 0.82 in Run 1 to 0.78 in Run 2 and to 0.72-0.73 under cross-condition transfer, supporting interpretation of these analyses as internal reproducibility and condition-shift assessments rather than independent external validation. Removing self-supervised pretraining reduced the ROC-AUC to 0.74. Explainability analyses identified distributed temporally relevant intervals and frontal-midline to centro-parietal channel contributions, with attribution interpreted as model-relevance evidence rather than causal biomarker evidence.
conclusionOverall, the findings provide preliminary internal evidence that self-supervised temporal representation learning can support participant-level classification of BDI-defined elevated depressive symptoms from resting-state EEG under the evaluated experimental conditions. The findings do not establish clinical diagnostic validity, screening readiness, or independent external generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.