Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42865166›Full record

ReviewSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2026

[Recent progress on sample pretreatment methods of emerging pollutants in food based on porous framework materials].

Jia-Qi Huang, Yang-Xia Han, Wei Ha, Ying-Shan Zhang, Yan-Ping Shi

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jia-Qi HuangLanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China.
Yang-Xia HanLanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China.
Wei HaLanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China.
Ying-Shan ZhangTibet Cheezheng Tibetan Medicine Co. ,Ltd. ,Lanzhou 730011,China.
Yan-Ping ShiLanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging pollutants (ECs) generally refer to chemicals or microorganisms that have known potential toxicity and health hazards. The defining characteristics of ECs include environmental persistence, bioaccumulation and biological toxicity. Primary categories of ECs comprise endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and antibiotics. Dietary intake represents a predominant pathway for human exposure to ECs. This necessitates the development of highly sensitive and reliable analytical methods. Conventional analytical instruments are fundamental for ECs determination. These include high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). However, the direct analysis of ECs in food remains a significant challenge. This is due to their wide sources, numerous types, complex structures, and ultra-low concentrations alongside substantial matrix interferences. Consequently, it is urgent to develop efficient sample pretreatment techniques to extract, enrich and purify ECs in food, in order to reduce matrix interference and construct the foundation for establishing highly sensitive, accurate, and stable analytical methods. Among various pretreatment techniques, solid-phase extraction (SPE) has gained prominence. It offers notable advantages over liquid-liquid extraction (LLE). These advantages include simple operation, low consumption of organic solvents and higher enrichment factors. To address specific analytical needs, several advanced SPE modalities have been developed, including magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE), solid-phase microextraction (SPME), dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE), and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE). Each variant offers unique benefits in terms of automation, speed, or selectivity. The performance of any SPE-based method is fundamentally governed by the adsorbent material. In recent years, porous framework materials have emerged as a revolutionary class of sorbents. They offer exceptional properties for extraction technology. Porous framework materials mainly include metal organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs), and, hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs). These materials are distinguished by their high specific surface area, tunable pore size and abundant sites for functionalization. Their structural periodicity and designability enable precise interaction with target analytes. This review provides a comprehensive and systematic overview of recent progress. It focuses on MOFs, COFs, and HOFs as next-generation adsorbents for ECs analysis. The article begins by introducing the fundamental structures and general properties of these three material classes. It details the synthesis strategies for both pristine materials and their composites. A major emphasis is placed on rational design principles. These principles aim to enhance adsorption performance. Key strategies discussed include ligand functionalization, defect engineering, and the construction of composite/hybrid materials. The review explains how these strategies modulate the adsorption mechanism, including size-exclusion, electrostatic interaction,

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsFood AnalysisFood ContaminationMetal-Organic FrameworksPorositySolid Phase ExtractionEnvironmental PollutantsMetal-Organic Frameworksemerging pollutantsfood analysisporous framework materialssample pretreatment

Identifiers

PMID42865166
PMCPMC13659879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.