ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Mismatch Responses to Prosodic Changes in Children With Developmental Language Disorder: A Longitudinal Approach.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mismatch Responses to Prosodic Changes in Children With Developmental Language Disorder: A Longitudinal Approach.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental language disorder is characterized by difficulties in auditory processing and prosody discrimination. Estonian word prosody features a unique three-way quantity distinction, characterized by changes in syllable duration and pitch contour, which differentiate word meaning and grammatical cases. In this study, we examined the Mismatch Responses longitudinally in 23 children with developmental language disorder and 25 age and biological sex matched typically developing peers (age at first measurement 4;6-6;5 years; age at second measurement 5;6-7;5 years). A multifeature paradigm was used in which all stimuli were meaningful words; two deviants differed from the standard, one in syllable duration and the other in both syllable duration and pitch contour. We also tested the discrimination of these prosodic features with behavioral tasks at both measurements. For duration discrimination, an early positive mismatch response diminished from first to second measurement, while a subsequent negative mismatch response increased. Significant longitudinal changes were observed in the typically developing group but not in children with developmental language disorder, while direct comparisons of maturational trajectories did not reveal significant group differences. For the duration and pitch contrast, in both groups and at both assessments, no mismatch response was detected. Additionally, no association was observed at the individual level between maturational changes in mismatch responses and behavioral discrimination at either measurement. These findings provide insights into the maturation of prosodic change detection processes and contribute to a better understanding of developmental language disorder and its manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.