SynthesisPhysiological reports2026
Factors influencing baseline electrocardiographic parameters in rats: A systematic review of experimental studies published from 1960 to the present.
Synthesis in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experimental studies in rats use baseline or control values as a reference against which changes after experimental interventions are assessed. However, baseline or control ECG parameters may already be influenced by several factors before the experiment begins, complicating interpretation of the results. Therefore, this review summarizes baseline or control ECG parameters (heart rate, PR (or PQ) interval, QRS complex, QT and QTc intervals, P-wave duration and amplitude, R- and T-wave amplitudes, and ST-segment) from 285 in vivo rat studies published from 1960 to the present, identified through searches of Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. The aim of this review was not to assess the quality of the included studies, but to help researchers navigate the data and identify potential biological and methodological sources of variability or confounding affecting baseline or control ECG parameters. Our findings should be interpreted with caution due to limitations including variability and small datasets in some groups, unequal sample sizes, aggregation of study-level mean values into a single mean, grouping of different anesthetic agents into a category, underrepresentation of females, incomplete reporting of anesthesia and measurement time, and inconsistent QTc correction methods. These limitations highlight the need for standardized experimental protocols and reporting practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.