Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42864952›Full record

ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2026

Assessing the use of ASAP-MS for Screening a UK Pub for Illicit Drug Substances.

Andriana Michailidis, Simone Mathias, Eloise Edgar-Gibson, David Douce, Victoria Starkie, Melanie Bailey, Patrick Sears

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andriana MichailidisSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0838-5411
Simone MathiasSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8450-7452
Eloise Edgar-GibsonSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
David DouceWaters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK.
Victoria StarkieWaters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK.
Melanie BaileyThe Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-7910
Patrick SearsSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-8800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illicit drug use in social environments, such as pubs and bars, has become an increasingly significant issue for public health and safety. These venues often provide a setting where individuals may engage in recreational drug use, resulting in their residual presence on high-contact surfaces. This study aims to investigate the presence of illicit drugs in a pub within the United Kingdom, focusing on common touchpoints such as the tables, bar and men's/women's bathrooms. Over 400 surface swabs were collected across 3 weeks, with the objective of identifying traces of illicit substances commonly associated with recreational use. This study additionally explored the potential of atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry (ASAP-MS) as a screening tool for the on-site detection of cocaine, ketamine, amphetamine, diazepam and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Previous research has demonstrated that ASAP-MS is an effective method for detecting illicit drugs with minimal sample preparation. An untargeted screening method was developed for direct swab analysis via glass capillary rod, whereas a combined untargeted and targeted approach was used for solvent-extracted samples. For confirmatory testing, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) determined the effectiveness of each ASAP-MS analysis. Results indicated that the targeted method with minimal sample preparation detected trace amounts of illicit drugs that were previously undetected using the initial screening method. However, the untargeted method, with direct sample analysis, showed potential for detecting larger quantities, particularly cocaine. Overall, the findings revealed drug residues at all touchpoints within the pub, particularly in the bathrooms which contained traces of cocaine in all samples.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsMass SpectrometrySubstance Abuse DetectionCocaineDrinking EstablishmentsHumansLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryUnited KingdomCocaineIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID42864952
PMCPMC13659026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.