Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42864681›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical case reports2026

A changing of the guard, continuity of purpose: the enduring importance of case reports at the Journal of Medical Case Reports.

Richard A Rison

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Richard A RisonDepartment of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. richardrison@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As I take on the role of Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Medical Case Reports (JMCR), I do so with gratitude and with no wish to reinvent a journal whose founding purpose remains sound: publishing peer-reviewed case reports that add clinically meaningful knowledge while protecting the people whose experiences make those reports possible. In this editorial, I look back at JMCR's origins under Michael Kidd and place the former Cases Journal and CasesDatabase initiatives in their historical context. I also reaffirm the journal's commitments to written consent for publication, CARE-compliant reporting, scientific rigor, clinical education, and accountable human editorial judgment. The current Springer Nature/BMC environment offers new ways to extend the educational life of published reports through the updated website, selected Cases of the Month, Springer Nature Research Communities, JMCR Clinical Minute, JMCR: Clinical Reasoning From Case Reports, Correspondence, and responsible social dissemination. Programs already active are distinguished from those still being developed or planned. The principle is straightforward: new formats should serve the carefully reviewed case report, never displace it.

Indexed as

Case Reports as TopicEditorial PoliciesPeriodicals as TopicPublishingHumansInformed ConsentCARE guidelinesCase reportsClinical educationEditorial responsibilityInformed consentMedical publishingPeer review

Identifiers

PMID42864681
PMCPMC13660000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.