ArticleBiology of sex differences2026
Sex differences in a mouse model of radiation-induced cardiomyopathy.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRadiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) may develop months to years following radiation therapy for cancers near the heart such as lung or breast cancer. Several mouse models of RIHD exist to study the pathogenesis of disease, but to our knowledge no studies have examined whether sex differences exist in RIHD in mice.
methodsFemale and male BALB/cJ mice received a single whole-heart dose of 22 Gy (Gy) radiation via a C5 collimator vs. sham controls that received 0 Gy, anesthesia and were placed in the X-ray machine for the same length of time. Endpoints were examined at 24 h (innate), day 10 (acute) and day 35 (chronic) post irradiation.
resultsFemales and males developed dsDNA breaks from radiation at day 10 but females had more damage than males (p < 0.001). Vessel area and wall thickness were increased by radiation at day 10 and 35 but vessel area was greater in irradiated males than females at day 35 (p = 0.003). Bulk RNA sequencing of the heart at day 10 revealed that females and males developed similar gene pathway responses to radiation by upregulating cellular repair pathways and developing mitochondrial dysfunction. However, females upregulated the master regulator of mitochondrial function, Pgc1α (p = 0.0001), suggesting possible improved mitochondrial repair in females. By day 35, females developed mild cardiomyopathy while males developed myocardial and perivascular fibrosis and inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy (iDCM).
conclusionsWe observed sex differences in most cardiac parameters that we examined following radiation exposure. BALB/c males exposed to 22 Gy radiation developed iDCM by day 35 while females developed mild cardiomyopathy. Further research is needed to better understand mechanisms driving sex differences in RIHD using translational animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.