ArticleBMC health services research2026
Insistent individualisation and eroding egalitarianism: Dominant discourses of equality in Swedish healthcare policy.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEquality is a core objective that is frequently invoked in Swedish healthcare policy, yet its meaning is rarely examined in depth. This study analyses how equality is articulated in two contemporary healthcare reforms. The aim is to map the extent to which discussions on equality are present and how it is assumed that equality is to be achieved, analyse the meanings of equality that are produced, and discuss and problematise possible implications.
methodsThe study applies discourse theory and conceptual discussions on equality, in the analysis of two major Swedish governmental reform reports: one on highly specialised care (SOU 2015:98) and the other on primary healthcare (SOU 2020:19).
resultsThree meanings of equality were identified, of which the first two are more commonly articulated. Firstly, equality is articulated as sameness and uniformity, particularly in relation to geographical access, coordination across actors and locations, and the standardisation of care through knowledge production and exchange. Secondly, equality is framed as individual agency and patient responsibility, emphasising patients as co-creators of care through mechanisms such as individual care plans and patient contracts. To a lesser extent, equality is also articulated as responsiveness to healthcare needs. The two dominant meanings reflect liberal and individualised notions of equality that prioritise uniform access and the removal of difference, alongside an emphasis on individual responsibility.
conclusionsThe analysis suggests that these dominant articulations marginalise more egalitarian or distributive understandings of equality that would take into account social determinants of health and unequal structural conditions. While equality occupies a central position in Swedish healthcare policy, its meaning is increasingly shaped by liberal values rather than commitments to social justice or redistribution. This has important implications for how healthcare reforms are designed and for the capacity of policy to address healthcare inequalities in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.