ArticleBMC medicine2026
Brain imaging-derived phenotypes influence risk of bipolar disorder: comprehensive exposome-wide association and wide-angled genetic analyses.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite many reported imaging markers for bipolar disorder (BD), systematic assessment across diverse brain imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) is lacking. We used epidemiological and genetic analyses to progress from association to causality and identify candidate biomarkers and potential pathways of BD.
methodsWe conducted an Exposome-Wide Association Study (ExWAS) in 35,680 UK Biobank participants to assess associations of 686 brain IDPs with BD. Genetic correlations were estimated via linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC). Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) and meta-analysis were performed using large-scale GWAS data to infer causality. Additional analyses, including Functional Mapping and Annotation (FUMA), protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis, and spatiotemporal gene expression profiling during human brain development, were performed to investigate potential biological mechanisms of BD and IDPs.
resultsIn our ExWAS analyses, we identified 10 significant exposome-level IDPs, and LDSC further revealed 67 IDPs with significant genetic correlations with BD. The MR analyses provided robust causal evidence for 12 IDPs, 6 of which were further validated by meta-analysis. Integrative analyses identified two associations supported by both epidemiological and genetic evidence (IDP.1510: fractional anisotropy in the forceps major, and IDP.0387: volume of the right lateral orbital frontal cortex). Additionally, we identified pleiotropic genes between IDPs and BD. Gene enrichment analyses implicated shared biological pathways, such as nucleosome assembly and neutrophil extracellular trap formation . PPI network analysis suggested that histone family members occupied central hubs in the interaction network. Spatiotemporal expression profiling identified region-specific developmental trajectories of pleiotropic genes in brain regions, including the cerebellum and thalamus, with the late fetal to early postnatal period potentially representing a sensitive developmental period for neurodevelopmental effects of BD susceptibility genes.
conclusionsThis study establishes an atlas of brain IDPs associated with BD, by integrating epidemiological and genetic evidence. The findings highlight candidate IDPs, including right lateral orbital frontal cortex volume and fractional anisotropy in the forceps major, that were consistently associated with BD across complementary analyses. Our results provide genetically supported targets for early intervention and precision psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.