Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42864618›Full record

SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2026

Magnesium sulfate versus dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for peribulbar block: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fahad Amin, Moazam Ali, Tarooba Khan, Muhammad Shoaib Bilal, Roshan Zahra, Hamza Sajid, Syed Zakria Ali Shah, Sanjeet Kumar, Saqib Rehman, Momna Ubaidullah and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fahad AminKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2076-9633
Moazam AliDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4589-6068
Tarooba KhanJinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9127-3381
Muhammad Shoaib BilalKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9387-6322
Roshan ZahraKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7519-5465
Hamza SajidAllama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1032-9297
Syed Zakria Ali ShahKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8044-2651
Sanjeet KumarShaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0009-1569
Saqib RehmanRahbar Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8132-6481
Momna UbaidullahKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5768-105X
Ayesha MudassarKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4460-0538
Enas Kamal Abdalaziz SeyedFaculty of Medicine, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan. enaskamal999@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1075-1055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegional anesthesia is widely used for ophthalmic surgery, but peribulbar block may have slower onset and variable akinesia. Dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate are used as adjuvants, yet their comparative effects remain uncertain.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane guidance (PROSPERO CRD420261435378). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane and Google Scholar were searched from inception to May 2026 for randomized controlled trials comparing magnesium sulfate with dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to peribulbar local anesthetic. Random-effects meta-analysis used REML, conventional and Hartung-Knapp confidence intervals, prediction intervals, leave-one-out sensitivity analyses, dosage and surgery-based subgroup analyses, and GRADE assessment.

resultsSix randomized controlled trials were included. Most pooled outcomes showed no statistically significant between-group differences, including sensory-block onset (MD - 0.04 min, 95% CI - 0.15 to 0.06), globe-akinesia onset (MD - 0.33 min, 95% CI - 1.61 to 0.96), globe-akinesia duration (MD - 11.46 min, 95% CI - 29.68 to 6.77), time to block adequacy (MD 0.10 min, 95% CI - 0.92 to 1.12), IOP at 5 and 10 min, akinesia scores, supplementary injection, and satisfaction. Dexmedetomidine was associated with faster lid-akinesia onset in the conventional analysis (MD 0.32 min, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.50; P = 0.0003), but the HK-adjusted CI crossed the null (- 0.31 to 0.95). Conventional analyses also favored dexmedetomidine for lid-akinesia duration (MD - 12.20 min, P = 0.0188) and time to first analgesia (MD - 18.22 min, P = 0.0101), but both lost statistical significance after HK adjustment. Heterogeneity was substantial for several outcomes, and GRADE certainty ranged from high to very low, with most outcomes rated very low.

conclusionCurrent evidence does not establish a clear efficacy or safety advantage of magnesium sulfate or dexmedetomidine as a peribulbar adjuvant. Apparent benefits for lid-akinesia onset, lid-akinesia duration, and time to first analgesia are sensitive to conservative statistical adjustment and should not be interpreted as definitive. The evidence base is small, heterogeneous, geographically concentrated, and generally low or very low certainty; adequately powered multicenter trials with standardized dosing and outcome assessment are needed.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, AnesthesiaDexmedetomidineMagnesium SulfateNerve BlockAnesthetics, LocalHumansAdjuvants, AnesthesiaAnesthetics, LocalDexmedetomidineMagnesium SulfateDexmedetomineMagnesium sulfateMeta analysisPeribulbar blockSystemaic review

Identifiers

PMID42864618
PMCPMC13660166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.