SynthesisBMC cancer2026
Neutropenia events with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor-containing versus control therapies in prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk of neutropenia associated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) intensification in patients with prostate cancer across phase 3 randomized controlled trials.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidance. PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched for phase 3 randomized controlled trials evaluating ARPI-containing regimens in prostate cancer. The primary outcomes were any grade and grade 3 or higher neutropenia. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Exploratory subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework.
resultsEight phase 3 randomized controlled trials were included. Seven trials involving 8,921 patients contributed to the analysis of any grade neutropenia, with 172 events among 4,897 patients in the ARPI-intensification arms and 118 among 4,024 patients in matched control arms (3.5% vs 2.9%). ARPI intensification was associated with a modest increase in any grade neutropenia (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.07-1.69; p = 0.010), with minimal heterogeneity (I
conclusionsARPI intensification compared with matched control regimens was associated with a modest increase in any grade neutropenia, whereas no significant increase was observed for grade 3 or higher neutropenia. Current randomized evidence does not establish that ARPIs independently increase the risk of severe neutropenia. Complete blood count monitoring may be individualized according to baseline hematologic risk and concomitant myelosuppressive therapy, particularly in patients receiving chemotherapy. Subgroup findings should be interpreted as exploratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.