ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
Gaugefixer: overcoming parameter non-identifiability in models of sequence-function relationships.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMathematical models of sequence-function relationships are widely used in computational biology. A key challenge when interpreting these models is that many different choices for model parameters can encode the same sequence-function relationship. These ambiguities, called "gauge freedoms," must be removed before parameter values can be meaningfully interpreted. Doing this requires imposing additional mathematical constraints on parameter values, a process called "fixing the gauge." We recently developed mathematical methods for fixing the gauge of a large class of commonly used models. The most direct computational implementation of these methods is often impractical, however, because it requires a projection matrix whose size scales quadratically with the number of parameters.
resultsHere we introduce GaugeFixer, a Python package that exploits the mathematical structure of gauge-fixing projections to achieve log-linear scaling in computation time and linear scaling in memory usage. GaugeFixer thus requires orders of magnitude less time and memory than standard matrix multiplication, and can fix the gauge of models having millions of parameters in seconds. To demonstrate its utility, we used GaugeFixer to analyze an empirical fitness landscape for translation initiation in bacteria. This analysis revealed striking similarities (but also fine-scale differences) in ribosome-binding preferences at different positions relative to the start codon, thereby aiding the interpretation of this otherwise unwieldy landscape.
conclusionsGaugeFixer thus fills an important gap in the computational tools available for interpreting quantitative models of sequence-function relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.