Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42864561›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026

More Attractive, More Heterosexual, Less Sexual? Perceptions of People with Physical Disabilities Across Observer Sex and Sexual Orientation.

Wylde M C Roberts-Mills, Farid Pazhoohi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wylde M C Roberts-MillsSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK. wylde.roberts-mills@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0521-5969
Farid PazhoohiSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9184-5361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appearance-based cues are used to inform social evaluations of others' likely sexual orientation and preferences. For people with physical disabilities (PWPD), whose appearances may be perceived as disrupting dominant norms of gender and sexuality, this reliance on visual cues, when combined with pervasive stereotypes of asexuality, may contribute to sexual discrimination and disenfranchisement. Despite this, quantitative research examining perceptions of the sexuality of PWPD remains limited. Therefore, the present study investigated how physical disability influenced perceptions of sociosexuality, sexual orientation, and attractiveness across observers of varying sex and sexual orientation. A sample of 189 adults without physical disabilities, equally weighted for sex and sexual orientation, rated images depicting individuals with visible limb loss and cropped images excluding the area of limb loss. Results showed that PWPD were rated lower in unrestricted sociosexuality compared to non-disabled individuals, while men rated physically disabled men higher in restricted sociosexuality than non-disabled men. Gay and lesbian participants rated men with physical disabilities as more heterosexual than nondisabled men. Contrary to expectations, PWPD were also rated as more attractive than their non-disabled counterparts, with interactions revealing that stimulus disability neutralized the male preference for female targets and induced a female target preference among gay and lesbian perceivers. Overall, the findings indicate the persistence of desexualizing stereotypes and the presence of heteronormative assumptions toward PWPD, extending theoretical understandings of how their sexuality is perceived.

Indexed as

AttractivenessMate-preferencePhysical disabilitySexualitySociosexual orientation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.