ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Continuous Release-Assisted Sharp-Tip Aspiration for Fibrotic Dorsocervical Fat Pads: A Phase-Adapted Cannula Protocol.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFibrotic dorsocervical fat pads ("buffalo humps") are challenging to treat with conventional blunt-tip liposuction because dense fibrofatty septa may limit cannula passage, aspiration efficiency, and contour refinement. Although sharp-cannula release has been introduced to address fibrotic resistance, existing approaches generally separate release from subsequent debulking and refinement.
objectivesTo describe a continuous release-assisted sharp-tip aspiration protocol using custom-designed cannulas throughout penetration, debulking, and refinement, and to evaluate its early clinical outcomes and safety.
methodsThirty patients with clinically evident fibrotic dorsocervical fat pads underwent a phase-adapted sharp-tip aspiration protocol using a 2.5 mm 2-port cannula and 3.0 mm 3- or 4-port cannulas. The protocol incorporated lesion-centered dual-circle marking, phase-adapted cannula selection, bimanual tactile control, and staged aspiration. Immediate postoperative B-mode ultrasonography was performed in representative cases. Twelve-month outcomes were assessed using a standardized 4-point photographic scale by two independent plastic surgeons, with inter-rater reliability evaluated using quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa. Patient satisfaction was also assessed at 12 months using a 5-point Likert scale.
resultsThe mean aspirated volume was 260.7 mL. At 12 months, both raters classified 93.3% of cases as good or excellent, and 80.0% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied. Exact inter-rater agreement was 73.3%, and quadratic weighted Cohen's κ was 0.63. Representative ultrasound showed residual treated subcutaneous tissue thickness of 0.55-0.74 cm, preserved layer continuity, and no obvious fluid collection or fascial disruption. No major complications or revision procedures occurred; minor complications resolved spontaneously or were managed conservatively.
conclusionsContinuous release-assisted sharp-tip aspiration appears feasible for selected fibrotic dorsocervical fat pads. By coupling septal disruption and aspiration throughout the procedure, this protocol may improve procedural consistency while preserving a minimally invasive approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42864547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.