ReviewNeurocritical care2026
Use of Desmopressin in Spontaneous Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Among Patients Taking Antiplatelet Therapy: Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-analysis.
Review in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antiplatelet therapy-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (APT-ICH) remains a significant neurological concern due to high morbidity and mortality among these patients. Early trials of desmopressin (DDAVP) suggested clinical benefit; however, the number of studies available at the time was limited. This systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis aim to answer whether administration of DDAVP among patients with APT-ICH improves clinical course. Five databases were searched for studies comparing DDAVP and placebo/control/usual care in patients with APT-ICH. Bayesian meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with three different priors. A total of seven studies were included. There was no difference in overall mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.23; 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.79-1.91], in-hospital mortality (OR 1.41; 95% CrI 0.88-2.26), or good functional outcome (OR 0.66; 95% CrI 0.34-1.31). Posterior distribution analysis suggested a possible increase in thromboembolic complications and the proportion of patients with poor neurological outcomes among patients on DDAVP. There is currently a lack of convincing evidence of benefit regarding the administration of DDAVP for patients with APT-ICH. Furthermore, there are several signals that raise concerns for harm.This review indicates that there is no clear, well-supported recommendation to administer DDAVP to patients with APT-ICH.The results of Bayesian meta-analysis reveal a concerning signal for harm with DDAVP administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42864513What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.