ArticlePharmaceutical research2026
Development of a Mechanistic Distribution Model for Predicting Drug Partitioning into Human Milk.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PURPOSE/
objectiveLimited clinical data on drug safety during lactation complicate benefit-risk assessment for breastfeeding women who require pharmacotherapy. Mechanistic prediction of the milk-to-plasma ratio within physiologically-based pharmacokinetic frameworks offers a complementary and efficient approach to traditional clinical lactation studies. We aimed to develop a mechanistic milk partitioning model for milk-to-plasma ratio prediction that explicitly accounts for protein binding, pH-dependent ionization, lipid partitioning, electrostatic interactions with acidic phospholipids present in milk fat globule membranes, and membrane potential effects on drug disposition.
methodsModel performance was compared with both the phase distribution model and its log-transformed variant using a verification dataset of 107 observations from 57 compounds with diverse physicochemical properties.
resultsFor acids, moderate-to-strong bases and ampholytes, the milk partitioning model demonstrated the best performance (absolute average fold error (AAFE): 1.99, 1.70 and 3.34), outperforming both comparator models. For weak bases, the milk partitioning model achieved comparable accuracy to the phase distribution model and its log-transformed variant (AAFE: 1.63 vs. 1.62 and 1.64) while showing lower bias (average fold error (AFE): 0.92 vs. 0.72 and 0.73). Finally, for neutral compounds, the phase distribution model showed superior performance to the milk partitioning model (AAFE: 2.35 vs. 2.60).
conclusionsWhen integrated within a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic framework, the milk partitioning model provides a mechanistically robust and practical tool to support quantitative assessment of drug transfer into human milk and inform safer dosing strategies for breastfeeding populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42864476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.