Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42864462›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

A multidisciplinary analysis of 8-mm port-site hernias in 2,337 robotic ports and the realities of its risk factors.

Shintaro Ozawa, Masatsune Shibutani, Yuki Seki, Kenji Kuroda, Hiroaki Kasashima, Yuichiro Miki, Mami Yoshii, Hiroji Shinkawa, Takeshi Yamasaki, Takeshi Fukuda and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shintaro OzawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Masatsune ShibutaniDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. fbxbj429@ybb.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2164-7394
Yuki SekiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Kenji KurodaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Hiroaki KasashimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Yuichiro MikiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Mami YoshiiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Hiroji ShinkawaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi YamasakiDepartment of Urology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi FukudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takeaki IshizawaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Junji UchidaDepartment of Urology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Toshiyuki SumiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kiyoshi MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPort-site hernia (PSH) at 8-mm robotic trocar sites is considered uncommon, and routine fascial closure is generally not recommended. However, clinically significant PSH continues to occur, and its underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of 8-mm PSH after robotic-assisted surgery and to explore practical preventive strategies.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 816 patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery across the gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary-pancreatic, urological, and gynecological specialties between January 2020 and December 2024. A total of 2337 8-mm ports were included, all of which were left without fascial closure. Patient characteristics, port locations, drain placement and size, operative times, and perioperative factors were evaluated in patients who developed PSH.

resultsThe median BMI of the overall cohort was 22.9 kg/m

conclusionsEight-millimeter PSH is a rare but potentially preventable complication of robotic-assisted surgery. The risk appears to be concentrated in non-obese patients with lateral abdominal wall ports, particularly when these sites are used for drain placement. Intraoperative digital assessment of the fascial defect using the "pinky test" may facilitate selective fascial closure of high-risk port sites and help reduce the occurrence of this complication.

Indexed as

Fascial closurePort-site herniaRobotic-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID42864462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.