Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42864435›Full record

ArticleNature computational science2026

Less can be more for predicting properties with large language models.

Nawaf Alampara, Santiago Miret, Kevin Maik Jablonka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature computational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nawaf AlamparaLaboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany. nawaf.alampara@uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7697-7315
Santiago MiretIntel Labs, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Kevin Maik JablonkaLaboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany. mail@kjablonka.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4894-4660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting properties from coordinate-category data-sets of vectors paired with categorical information-is fundamental to computational science, manifesting in materials science as predicting formation energies or elastic moduli from crystal structures. While large language models (LLMs) have increasingly been applied to such tasks, optimal strategies for achieving reliable predictions remain elusive. Here we report fundamental limitations in LLM's ability to learn from coordinate information in coordinate-category data. Through systematic experiments using synthetic datasets with tunable coordinate and category contributions, and a comprehensive benchmarking framework (MatText), we find that LLMs consistently fail to capture coordinate information while excelling at category patterns. This geometric blindness persists regardless of model size (up to 70 billion parameters), dataset scale (up to 2 × 10

Identifiers

PMID42864435
PMCPMC13686937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.