ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Bridging therapy in pediatric and AYA patients under 25 years with relapsed/refractory B-ALL undergoing anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy: a multicenter retrospective study by the Spanish group GETH-TC.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CAR-T therapy is a powerful treatment for pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, the impact of bridging therapy prior to CAR-T infusion on patient outcomes remains insufficiently explored. In this retrospective study of patients with relapse/refractory B-ALL (N = 103), we compared outcomes across different bridging therapy groups: Low-Intensity Chemotherapy (LIC, N = 50), Immunotherapy (N = 20), or High-Intensity Chemotherapy (HIC, N = 33). At day +28 post-infusion, LIC and Immunotherapy showed significantly higher rates of Complete Remission with negative Minimal Residual Disease compared with HIC (96% vs 85% vs 75%), along with lower rates of disease progression (4% vs 10% vs 15.2%) and treatment-related mortality (0% vs 5% vs 9.1%). Additionally, patients who received three or more prior lines of therapy before CAR-T infusion exhibited significantly lower response rates. Despite potential biases, such as intrinsic disease aggressiveness or unidentified genomic alterations, present findings suggest that using LIC or immunotherapy as bridging strategies, in patients with fewer prior treatment lines, may be associated with a lower overall disease and treatment burden and could potentially contribute to improved CAR-T cell efficacy and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, additional investigations are required to elucidate biological and clinical mechanisms by which bridging approaches and treatment history modulate CAR-T responses.
Identifiers
42864394What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.