ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026
Using the Geriatric Core Dataset (G-CODE) to predict mortality in older patients with cancer: development and external validation.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02884375 (Elderly Cancer Patient), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Elderly Cancer Patient: ELCAPA Cohort Survey
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Geriatric Core Dataset (G-CODE) was developed to standardise geriatric assessment (GA) in older adults with cancer. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a mortality prediction score based on the G-CODE at 6-month (main endpoint), 12- and 24-month (secondary endpoints), in older patients with cancer.
methodsData came from two prospective French cohorts of cancer patients aged ≥70 referred for GA: the Elderly Cancer Patients (ELCAPA) cohort (training set) and the Geriatric Oncology Marseille (GOM) cohort (validation set). G-CODE items were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analyses, with Akaike information criterion selection. Discrimination was assessed using time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve (tAUC) for 6-, 12-, and 24-month mortality.
resultsWe included 950 and 766 patients in the training and validation sets (mean ± sd age: 83 ± 6 years/81 ± 6 years; men: 55%/59%; 6-month mortality: 27%/22%). The final G-CODE model highlighted five strong predictors of 6-month mortality: not having a caregiver, weight loss, comorbidities, an impaired 4-instrumental activities of daily living score, and an impaired timed-up-and-go test. The tAUCs of the model, including the G-CODE, age, cancer type, metastases, and treatment, were 82%, 78% and 80%.
conclusionsThe final G-CODE score (range: 0-17) accurately predicts 6-, 12-, and 24-month mortality. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT02884375 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Identifiers
42864377What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.