ArticleNature communications2026
Assessing the use of automatic speech recognition and large language models for individuals with language impairments.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have attracted much attention for healthcare applications, demonstrating strong potential in automating conversational interactions. However, cloud-hosted systems raise privacy concerns and text-based interfaces can be difficult for children, older adults, and individuals with language impairments. Edge-deployed, voice-enabled LLM systems may address these barriers by keeping data local and using automatic speech recognition (ASR) for speech input. However, ASR transcripts often contain disfluencies, fillers, grammatical errors, and recognition noise, which may reduce downstream LLM performance for speakers with atypical language patterns. Here, we systematically evaluate edge-oriented ASR-LLM pipelines for individuals with language impairments using comparison studies and ablation experiments across aphasia, child language impairment, and dementia datasets. We identify transcript errors, repetition, noise, and input length as factors affecting system performance and deployment feasibility. These findings highlight key challenges for building more reliable and accessible speech-enabled AI systems for healthcare applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.