ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Assessing the effect of subthalamic stimulation on metaperception in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most human studies on perceptual decision-making are correlational, and few addressed the causal role of the neural markers they identify. Here, we took the opportunity offered by deep brain stimulation to study the causal role of subthalamo-cortical networks on perceptual decision-making and perceptual monitoring. We asked participants with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) treated with subthalamic stimulation to detect visual stimuli and provide confidence reports while we recorded scalp electroencephalography. Following a preregistered plan, we compared behavioural and neural results between patients off-stimulation and matched healthy controls and among patients on and off-stimulation to identify the effect of subthalamic stimulation on perceptual choices and metacognitive judgments. Our results indicate that patients off-stimulation detected visual stimuli similarly to matched healthy controls but provided poorer confidence judgments, indicative of a potential metacognitive alteration. Moreover, chronic subthalamic stimulation significantly reduced clinical symptoms, but acute stimulation changes did not impact visual detection, confidence, nor corresponding event-related potentials at the scalp level. We conclude that acute changes in subthalamic stimulation are insufficient to modify the potential metacognitive alterations observed in OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.