Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42863780›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2026

Diffuse esophageal eosinophilia is associated with increased endoscopic severity and topical steroid non-response in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

Stefani Aleman, Alexandra A Weir, Sean S LaFata, Timothy S Gee, Angelica R Mirzoca, Arjun K Juneja, Hannah L Thel, Brenderia A Cameron, Justin McCallen, Christopher J Lee and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Stefani AlemanCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Alexandra A WeirCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Sean S LaFataCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Timothy S GeeCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Angelica R MirzocaCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Arjun K JunejaCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Hannah L ThelCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Brenderia A CameronCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Justin McCallenCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Christopher J LeeCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Gustaf N HendrickCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Jose C BermudezCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Daniel SongCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Walker D ReddCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Trevor S BarloweCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Cary C CottonCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Craig C ReedCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing.
Evan S DellonCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: edellon@med.unc.edu.

Funding

DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
SHORT-TERM RESEARCH TRAININGT35DK007386 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Evan Samuel Dellon · 1986 to 2026
$4.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK007386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsVariability of esophageal eosinophil distributions and its impact on disease presentation and treatment outcomes in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is unclear. We aimed to determine whether isolated proximal or distal involvement differs from diffuse involvement in EoE presentation and treatment outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed patients of all ages with newly diagnosed EoE from the UNC EoE Clinicopathologic database. Patients were classified as distal esophagus-only (≥15 eos/hpf), proximal-only (≥15 eos/hpf), and diffuse involvement (≥15 eos/hpf in both regions). Outcomes included histologic response (<15, ≤6, and <1 eos/hpf), global symptomatic response, and endoscopic response after treatment. Baseline characteristics and post-treatment response were compared between patients with localized and diffuse eosinophil involvement.

resultsOf 888 cases of EoE, eosinophil counts were higher in the distal (54.8±44.7) versus proximal esophagus (44.0±40.1; p<0.001). Diffuse involvement (n=623; 70%) was associated with more inflammatory endoscopic findings and higher mean EREFS (4.0±1.8, p<0.001) compared to those with proximal (2.8±1.8) and distal involvement (2.7±1.6). Strictures and worse disease severity (Index of Severity for EoE) were also more frequent in diffuse disease. After topical corticosteroid treatment (n=395), patients with diffuse disease had reduced histologic response (at all thresholds) and endoscopic response compared to those with localized disease.

conclusionsEoE patients with diffuse esophageal eosinophilic involvement had greater baseline disease severity and decreased histologic and endoscopic treatment response to topical corticosteroids than those with localized disease. Diffuse disease involvement could be an important marker for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in EoE disease management.

Indexed as

cohort studydisease extentEoEoutcomestreatment

Identifiers

PMID42863780
PMCPMC13665495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.