Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42863075›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Heterochronicity shapes brain network formation.

Francesco Poli, Stuart Oldham, Alexa Mousley, Edward T Bullmore, Petra E Vértes, Duncan E Astle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Heterochronicity shapes brain network formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco PoliMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-0056
Stuart OldhamDevelopmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9619-6102
Alexa MousleyMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.
Edward T BullmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-8283
Petra E VértesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0992-3210
Duncan E AstleMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.

Funding

NWO | Sociale en Geesteswetenschappen, NWO (SSH) 019.242SG.015Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF) TWCF-2022-30510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain network formation unfolds on a nonuniform developmental timetable, with different cortical regions generating connections at different developmental phases. Generative network models (GNMs) aim to uncover the principles underpinning the organization of connectomes by creating synthetic networks according to simple computational rules. These models capture the connectome's topology, operationalized here as the cumulative distributions of network metrics (e.g., modularity, small-worldness, rich-club structure). However, GNMs typically ignore the differential timing of connectivity formation, and by omitting this temporal programme they often misplace topological features in physical space. Here, we add a heterochronous growth term to GNMs and use a model fitness function that weighs topology and topography equally. Topography refers to the spatial embedding of the network-the actual anatomical positions of the axonal tracts. With these advances, we can generate synthetic networks that more faithfully reproduce the spatial layout of diffusion-MRI connectomes from two independent adult cohorts. Compared with classical, temporally agnostic models, heterochronous simulations improve model fit, accurately locate cortical hubs and modules across individuals, and converge on a single caudal-to-rostral gradient of brain maturation. Overall, integrating heterochronicity makes GNMs more faithful to brain development, and allows for better identification of individual differences in network formation.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeModels, NeurologicalNerve NetComputer SimulationHumansbrain developmentconnectomegenerative network modelingheterochronicity

Identifiers

PMID42863075
PMCPMC13684247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.