ArticlePloS one2026
Rabbit distal femoral critical size bone defect model: Vascular anatomy, surgical technique, peri-operative husbandry and biological response of empty and autograft-filled defects.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCritical size bone defects do not heal spontaneously and are often used preclinically to evaluate the in vivo response to materials, devices or bone graft substitutes. Results may inform product development or satisfy regulatory body requirements, whilst also, providing clinically relevant information that cannot be obtained by in vitro or in silico experimentation. The New Zealand White (NZW) Rabbit distal femoral condylar defect in skeletally mature animals is a common model used in the development and evaluation of bone graft materials. When performed with appropriate consideration of the many pre, peri and post-operative factors the morbidity with this model is low. We present our experience with this model to provide a technical reference including the local vascular anatomy, surgical technique, peri-operative husbandry in large series between 2017-2022. The typical healing responses of empty and autogenous corticocancellous bone-filled defects is provided to assist in illustrating the model. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe local vascular anatomy was characterised ex vivo with anatomical dissection and intra-vascular injection of methylene blue, and an iohexol contrast study with micro-computed tomography. The in vivo animal model is described, highlighting the surgical approach, technique for defect creation and perioperative animal husbandry considerations. Examining outcomes from animals operated on over a 5-year period between 2017 and 2022 at our institution, the biological response following defect creation is also described qualitatively for empty defects (negative control) and autograft-filled defects (positive control) at 6 and 12-weeks post-operatively, with paraffin and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) histology and micro-computed tomography (µCT) endpoints.
results2040 individual defects were created in 1020 rabbits confirmed to be skeletally mature with radiographs. Anaesthetic and intra-operative complications occurred with a very low incidence (1/ 1020 animals {0.1%}and 1/ 2040 defects {0.05%}, respectively). No post-operative complications impacting the healing outcomes or necessitating removal from the study occurred. Empty defects functioned as critically sized defects over a 12-week period, whilst autograft implanted into defects had incorporated into the surrounding cancellous architecture at 12 weeks. Closure of the cortical bone surface on the medial aspect of the femur was restored at 12 weeks, but not 6 weeks.
conclusionIn vivo models provide invaluable, irreplaceable preclinical data; however, such high-impact studies must have a sound ethical basis and be conducted with animal welfare and scientific rigour at the forefront of study design and execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.