ArticlePloS one2026
Experiences and perspectives of Ayurvedic practitioners on non-communicable disease management in the UK: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNon-communicable diseases (NCDs) are a major public health challenge in the United Kingdom (UK), placing strain on the National Health Service (NHS). While Western medicine dominates NCD care, the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), such as Ayurveda, is increasing. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of Ayurvedic practitioners in the UK regarding the use of Ayurveda for managing NCDs.
methodsSeventeen UK-based Ayurvedic practitioners participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews that were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically.
findingsThree key themes were identified. First, Ayurvedic practitioners viewed their role as complementary to Western medicine, providing holistic, individualised, and patient-centred care to support NCD management. Second, they faced multiple barriers in the UK, including structural challenges (limited integration, poor institutional support, and restricted patient access) and financial constraints (high treatment costs, lack of NHS coverage, and import regulations). Finally, professional associations played a vital role in providing legal and regulatory guidance, promoting continuous professional development, and supporting research to strengthen evidence and legitimacy.
conclusionAlthough Ayurvedic practitioners face considerable challenges in the UK, they play a unique role in negotiating legitimacy, professional recognition, and the epistemological challenges of practising within a Western-dominated healthcare system. Professional associations help legitimise and advance their practice, supporting culturally congruent, patient-centred care that complements conventional NCD management. Despite structural barriers, Ayurvedic practitioners have maintained their presence and have navigated a complex, structurally Western-centric healthcare landscape, offering insights into integrative approaches to NCD care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.