Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42862602›Full record

ArticleFaraday discussions2026

Electrolysis without electrodes: thermodynamic and kinetic insights into decoupled alkaline water electrolysis.

Mark Potter, Luís Pinho, Kathryn E Toghill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Faraday discussions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark PotterDepartment of Chemistry, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 5UB, UK. k.toghill@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3224-4744
Luís PinhoDepartment of Chemistry, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 5UB, UK. k.toghill@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4872-7247
Kathryn E ToghillDepartment of Chemistry, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 5UB, UK. k.toghill@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-6818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional water electrolysis is fundamentally limited by the kinetic constraints of coupled electrode reactions, particularly the oxygen evolution reaction, which necessitate substantial overpotentials despite decades of catalyst development. Recently, spatially and temporally decoupled electrolysis has emerged as a new paradigm in which electrochemical charge storage and catalytic fuel production are separated. This decoupling enables catalysis beyond the confines of the electrode surface and fundamentally alters how electrons are delivered to the catalyst. Here, we investigate redox-mediated hydrogen evolution in strongly alkaline media, examining the interplay between dissolved redox mediators and heterogeneous hydrogen evolution catalysts. Notably, we demonstrate that separating electron transfer from catalytic hydrogen evolution minimises some of the kinetic penalty associated with the electrode-electrolyte interface, enabling hydrogen evolution at potentials approaching the thermodynamic limit, even on nickel catalysts. Nevertheless, catalyst identity remains critical in determining reaction kinetics. Comparison of platinum and Raney® nickel reveals a prolonged activation period unique to nickel, demonstrating that catalyst surface chemistry continues to govern hydrogen evolution despite the absence of direct electrode-mediated electron transfer. These findings establish decoupled electrolysis as a fundamentally distinct model for investigating the interplay between charge transfer and catalysis, providing new insight into electrocatalytic energy conversion.

Identifiers

PMID42862602
PMCPMC13657250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.