ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Agile Co-design in Public Mental Health: An Integrated Model for Continuous Service Improvement.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Co-design has become central to mental health reform in Australia, yet it is often applied episodically rather than as a continuous practice. In public mental health, service change must occur alongside ongoing service delivery, creating challenges for leaders seeking to apply co-design principles. Agile project management provides a structured approach for iterative, reflective, and adaptive collaboration. This paper proposes an Agile co-design model and illustrates its application through reflective analysis of implementation within a public mental health service in Victoria, Australia. This approach responds directly to the Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System mandate for authentic co-design and lived experience leadership in reform, moving beyond one-off project phases to embed co-design as an ongoing governance capability. Evidence suggests that Agile approaches improve delivery pace and cross-functional collaboration in healthcare, while co-design strengthens service relevance, acceptability, and trust. As such, Agile co-design may provide a mechanism for incorporating consumer and clinician voices within continuous system reform, complementing existing co-design frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42862524What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.