ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2026
Adapting Segment Anything Model 3 for concept-driven lesion segmentation in medical images: an experimental study.
Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of lesions is fundamental for medical image analysis. However, most existing approaches are designed for specific anatomical sites and imaging modalities, limiting their applicability in heterogeneous clinical environments. Recent vision-language foundation models have enabled concept-driven segmentation of natural images, offering a promising path toward more flexible and generalizable medical image segmentation. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, concept-prompt-based lesion segmentation in medical images, particularly using the latest Segment Anything Model 3 (SAM3), has not been thoroughly examined. In this paper, the authors present a systematic investigation of the SAM3 framework for lesion segmentation. An extensive evaluation of SAM3 was first conducted using geometric bounding boxes and concept-based text and image exemplars as prompts for lesion segmentation across multiple cancer types and imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, ultrasound, dermoscopy, and endoscopic imaging, with particular emphasis on volumetric medical imaging datasets. To improve robustness and segmentation accuracy, additional knowledge into the input representation was further integrated, including predictions from adjacent slices, multiparametric imaging information, and prior annotations. In addition, the study compared different SAM3 fine-tuning strategies on the BraTS2023-MET dataset, including partial module fine-tuning, adapter-based optimization, and full-model fine-tuning, under different training objectives. Extensive experiments conducted on 13 datasets covering 11 lesion types demonstrate that SAM3 achieves strong cross-modality generalization and accurate instance-specific lesion delineation. These results highlight the potential of concept-driven foundation models for scalable and practical medical-image segmentation in real-world clinical settings. The source code and dataset splits are publicly available at https://github.com/apple1986/lesion-sam3 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.