ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2026
Does habitat protection status matter? Insights from a tropical primate community in Northeast Bangladesh.
Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protected areas are central to primate conservation worldwide, yet the contribution of adjacent non-protected forests remains poorly understood. We conducted the first systematic assessment of primate communities across the Tarap Hill Reserve Forest, Northeast Bangladesh, to compare primate communities between its formally protected and non-protected forest parts. We surveyed 147.32 km of diurnal and 100.34 km of nocturnal transects, recording 48 clusters of five diurnal primate species and 20 individual Bengal slow lorises. Western hoolock gibbon found only in protected forests, Northern pig-tailed macaque only in non-protected forests, whereas the remaining species were recorded in both. Relative density estimates varied among species, but forest protection status did not significantly influence overall primate encounter rates or species-specific cluster sizes. These findings highlight species-specific patterns associated with habitat protection status and may indicate the complementary conservation value of both protected and adjacent non-protected forests. Integrated management of both should therefore be important for sustaining primate populations and other wildlife in such fragmented landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42862505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.