Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42862485›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2026

From Contrasts to Representations: Rethinking fMRI Approaches for Cortico-Cerebellar Networks.

Carolyn N Irving, Maedbh King, Amanda LeBel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolyn N IrvingDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. cirving@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4599-5812
Maedbh KingMcGovern Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Amanda LeBelDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between the cerebellum and cerebrum remains poorly understood in the neuroimaging literature, despite decades of functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) research. In this opinion article, we argue that this gap reflects fundamental methodological constraints rather than merely a lack of scientific interest. We first discuss challenges in acquiring fMRI data and analysis, with an emphasis on the cerebellum. We then critically evaluate the most common analysis approaches including functional connectivity, univariate contrasts, multivariate pattern analysis, and encoding models, examining the contributions and limitations of each to identify and quantify cortico-cerebellar networks. Through the lens of language processing, we briefly review how these approaches have been applied to characterize cortico-cerebellar networks underlying cognitive function. We conclude by proposing that encoding model frameworks, combined with ecologically valid naturalistic paradigms, offer advantages that can help resolve longstanding debates about cortico-cerebellar network function and organization.

Indexed as

CerebellumCerebral CortexMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetAnimalsBrain MappingCognitionHumansNeural PathwaysCerebellumCognitionConnectivityEncoding modelsfMRI

Identifiers

PMID42862485
PMCPMC13658391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.