Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42862474›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reports : PR2026

Linking preclinical models with functional imaging and artificial intelligence to decode tumor angiogenesis.

Lenka Varinská, Pieter Koolwijk

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lenka VarinskáDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Trieda SNP 1, Košice, 040 11, Slovakia. lenka.varinska@upjs.sk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8965-1528
Pieter KoolwijkDepartment of Physiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0314-6788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor angiogenesis is a hallmark of cancer, influencing oxygen delivery, immune cell trafficking, and therapeutic response. Although anti-angiogenic therapies have achieved clinical relevance, their efficacy remains limited by tumor heterogeneity, adaptive resistance, and insufficient functional assessment of tumor vasculature. In this review, we evaluate preclinical models of tumor angiogenesis with a focus on their ability to generate quantitative and physiologically relevant readouts. We discuss established assays such as tube formation, fibrin bead assay, aortic ring, and chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) models, alongside emerging systems including vascularized organoids and organ-on-a-chip platforms, as well as zebrafish and murine tumor models. Particular emphasis is placed on advanced imaging modalities enabling longitudinal assessment of perfusion, permeability, and vascular remodeling, as well as on the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) in automated and quantitative data interpretation. We further highlight the integration of single-cell and multi-omics approaches for resolving endothelial heterogeneity and tumor-stroma interactions. By linking biologically relevant models with functional imaging and computational analysis, this review outlines strategies to improve the predictive power and translational relevance of angiogenesis research.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis assaysImage analysisMulti-omicsOrgan-on-a-chipSingle-cell sequencingVessel co-option

Identifiers

PMID42862474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.