ArticleInfection2026
Healthcare pathways and outpatient management prior to community-acquired sepsis hospitalization in Germany, 2016-2019.
Article in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSepsis often presents with non-specific symptoms that delay diagnosis and treatment. This study characterized pre-hospital outpatient and emergency care among patients with community-acquired sepsis (CAS) in Germany prior to hospitalization.
methodsThis population-based observational cohort study used de-identified health claims data from over 340,000 AOK-insured adults admitted to hospital between 2016 and 2019 with an ICD-10-GM code for sepsis plus organ dysfunction, with each patient contributing only their first qualifying hospitalization (index case). Patients without ICD-10-GM codes for and suggestive of nosocomial infection were included and their healthcare utilization in the week before admission was categorized into: hospital emergency care (HEC), outpatient care only (OC), or no healthcare utilization (no HCU) (excluding patients exclusively hospitalized in the week prior sepsis hospitalization). Treatment and patient characteristics, sepsis features, and outcomes as documented in health claims data were compared across groups using descriptive and non-parametric statistics.
resultsAmong 238,247 patients identified with CAS, 12.7% received HEC, 61.8% OC, and 25.5% had no HCU. HEC patients were younger, more severely ill, with higher ICU admission and mortality rates compared to the other groups. In the OC group, most patients (82.3%) had encounters with general practitioners, and 45.1% received OC on the day of admission. The last infection-related encounter occurred on average 2.0 days (SD 2.3) prior to sepsis hospitalization. Among OC patients, 48.7% underwent infection-related laboratory diagnostics, and 11.4% received anti-infective prescriptions.
conclusionMost patients with CAS had healthcare contact in the week prior to hospitalization, predominantly in outpatient care. The frequent encounters shortly before admission and low rates of anti-infective prescription may suggest opportunities for earlier recognition and better risk stratification, e.g. by strengthening sepsis awareness and diagnostic strategies in outpatient settings.
trial registrationThe study was pre-registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00031302) on 05/05/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42862469What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.