ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Plastic-algae interactions in freshwater and marine systems: mechanisms, evidence and prospects for bioremediation.
Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plastic pollution is among this century's defining environmental problems, and aquatic systems carry a disproportionate share. As polymers fragment into microplastics and nanoplastics they disperse through rivers, lakes and oceans, harming organisms and entering food webs. Algae have attracted growing attention as a biological complement to physical and chemical clean-up. This review synthesises peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2026 on interactions between plastics and freshwater and marine algae. We examine eukaryotic microalgae from freshwater (Chlorella, Scenedesmus, Coccomyxa, Uronema) and marine systems (Navicula, Phaeodactylum, Skeletonema, Dunaliella); cyanobacteria (Phormidium, Oscillatoria, Anabaena, Nostoc, Arthrospira), treated separately as prokaryotes; and the macroalga Sargassum. Reported outcomes range widely from a few percent of low-density polyethylene surface-altered by cyanobacteria, to roughly a quarter of mixed-polymer film attributed to Coccomyxa, and up to ~ 27% of high-density polyethylene by a freshwater epiplastic consortium, along with many studies that document surface colonisation, hetero-aggregation and physiological stress rather than complete breakdown. We explain the mechanisms involved: extracellular enzymes proposed to cleave polymer chains, the extracellular polymeric substances that anchor cells to plastic, reactive-oxygen-driven oxidation and the staged formation of the plastisphere. The supporting evidence is graded from gene prediction to demonstration by a purified enzyme. Most outcomes prove to be physical capture or surface modification, and no study reviewed demonstrates mineralisation. We assess engineered diatoms and green algae expressing bacterial PET hydrolases and identify what field application would require: synthetic consortia, omics-based enzyme mining, photobioreactor integration, machine-learning-guided enzyme design, and standardised protocols focused on mineralisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42862464What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.