ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Challenges in Accommodating Talker Variability in Lexical Tone Perception Among Autistic Adults: Implications for Talker Adaptation.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSuccessful speech perception requires listeners to accommodate acoustic variability arising both across talkers and within a single talker. This challenge is especially pronounced in tone languages, where fundamental frequency (F0) simultaneously encodes lexical meaning and talker identity. The present study investigated how between-talker and within-talker variability affects lexical tone perception in Cantonese-speaking adults with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
methodsTwenty-five adults with ASD and 25 neurotypical (NT) controls completed a speeded word identification task involving minimal word pairs differentiated by level tones. Between-talker variability was manipulated by presenting words produced by either a single talker or multiple talkers, and within-talker variability was manipulated by using either a single exemplar or multiple exemplars from each talker. Performance was assessed using identification accuracy, response time (RT), and a composite efficiency measure.
resultsBoth groups demonstrated reliable processing costs associated with between-talker variability, reflected in lower accuracy, longer RTs, and reduced efficiency, with no group difference in the magnitude of this effect. In contrast, only the ASD group exhibited reduced efficiency under within-talker variability. Furthermore, within-talker and between-talker processing costs were not significantly correlated in either group.
conclusionThese findings suggest that autistic adults may experience greater difficulty accommodating subtle within-talker acoustic variability during lexical tone perception, consistent with a more detail-focused processing style. Such difficulty may have implications for everyday speech understanding in socially diverse listening environments while highlighting the importance of distinguishing between-talker normalization from within-talker stabilization in models of speech perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42862435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.