Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42862416›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2026

Race, Diet, and Cardiometabolic Risk in US Young Adults: A Biosocial Framework Integrating Biological Mechanisms and Structural Inequities Toward Precision Nutrition.

Onyedika G Ani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Onyedika G AniDepartment of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA. ogang2@missouri.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0986-8020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCardiometabolic disease disproportionately affects Black populations in the US, yet dietary interventions have not reduced these disparities. This review examines race as a biosocial construct integrating ancestry-related biology and structural exposures to understand cardiometabolic risk and dietary response in precision nutrition RECENT

findingsEvidence suggests racial differences in glucoregulatory physiology, metabolically relevant allele frequencies, stress-related epigenetic regulation, gut microbiome composition, and metabolomic profiles. Functional foods, including fruits, vegetables, and nuts, target pathways linked to these phenotypes. However, most intervention studies involve older, predominantly White populations, limiting understanding of race-specific responses. The review proposes the "cumulative racial biological phenotype" framework, where ancestry-related biology and structural exposures jointly influence cardiometabolic risk. It advances the greater plasticity hypothesis, suggesting greater baseline biological perturbation may predict larger dietary responses. Testing these concepts requires race-stratified, multi-omics dietary intervention trials in young adults using culturally and structurally responsive designs to improve the effectiveness and equity of precision nutrition.

Indexed as

Cardiometabolic Risk FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesDietHealth Status DisparitiesRacial GroupsBlack or African AmericanGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansPrecision MedicineUnited StatesCardiometabolic diseaseFunctional foodsGut microbiomeMulti-omicsPrecision nutritionRace disparities

Identifiers

PMID42862416
PMCPMC13658382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.