SynthesisSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Anatomical variation in the cervical branch of the facial nerve: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a paucity of literature on the anatomical variations of the cervical branch of the facial nerve (CBFN). Poor awareness of its anatomy and variations risks intraoperative damage, misdiagnosis of facial nerve injury and undesirable functional and aesthetic outcomes for patients. PURPOSE: To review anatomical studies on the CBFN and synthesise data on its course, innervations and common variations.
methodsA PRISMA-compliant systematic review of anatomical studies of the cervical branch of the facial nerve was conducted. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched up to July 2025. Papers were quality appraised, and data relevant to the anatomy of the CBFN were extracted.
resultsThirty-five papers with a collated sample size of 867 hemi-necks were identified: 25 with anatomical dissections and 10 case reports. The mean number of CBFN branches was 1.34 (sensitivity range 1.31-1.36). Communication with the marginal mandibular nerve, transverse cervical nerve and great auricular nerve was variable, with prevalences ranging from 22-97%. Distances between the nerve and anatomical landmarks were heterogeneous. Many individual cases of cervical branch variation in course and relationship to nearby vasculature were identified.
conclusionThe cervical branch of the facial nerve displays wide variability in its course. Pre-operative mapping, careful dissection and intra-operative nerve stimulation to aid accurate identification are recommended to prevent iatrogenic damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.