Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42862345›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2026

Can Verbal Cues Enhance Respiratory-Swallow Coordination for Individuals Following Head and Neck Cancer?

Michelle Lawton, Michael Drinnan, Chris Ward, Brian Saccente-Kennedy, Joanne Patterson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle LawtonSchool of Allied Health Professions & Nursing, Institute of Population Health/Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, 1.2 Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK. Michelle.lawton@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2399-6643
Michael DrinnanSchool of Health & life Sciences, Teeside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Chris WardCookson Building Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Brian Saccente-KennedyCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, London, UK.
Joanne PattersonSchool of Allied Health Professions & Nursing, Institute of Population Health/Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, 1.2 Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit 303061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atypical respiratory-swallow coordination is associated with increased aspiration risk and swallow inefficiency. While verbal cueing has been shown to influence respiratory-swallow coordination in people with Parkinson's disease, its effect in individuals following head and neck cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of verbal cuing on respiratory-swallow coordination in this population. A prospective, with-in subjects' design was employed. Respiratory Inductance Plethysmography, nasal airflow and submental electromyograms were used to capture respiratory-swallow patterning, lung volume at swallow initiation (LVSI) and respiratory pause duration. Participants were verbally cued to swallow at four different points within tidal breathing: high inhalation, low inhalation, high exhalation, low exhalation. Non-cued swallow trials served as a control condition. Eighteen participants contributed a total of 360 analysable swallow trials. A significant increase was observed in optimal phasing (exhale-swallow-exhale) in the high inhalation and high exhalation cued conditions, compared to the non-cued condition OR [95% CI] = 4.74 [1.86, 12.09]; OR [95% CI] = 2.55 [1.11, 5.86] respectively. Verbal cueing significantly increased LVSI at low inhalation relative to non-cued swallows by 19%. In contrast, verbal cues at high and low exhalation significantly decreased LVSI, with mean decreases of 28% and 32%, respectively. This study shows that verbal cueing influences respiratory-coordination in individuals with head and neck cancer and suggests cuing at high inhalation is more likely to elicit optimal respiratory-swallow coordination (exhale-swallow-exhale pattern initiated at mid tidal lung volumes), highlighting the potential for introducing targeted cueing strategies to enhance respiratory-swallow coordination.

Indexed as

AspirationDeglutition disordersLung volumeRespiratoryRespiratory pause

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.