ArticleDysphagia2026
Can Verbal Cues Enhance Respiratory-Swallow Coordination for Individuals Following Head and Neck Cancer?
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atypical respiratory-swallow coordination is associated with increased aspiration risk and swallow inefficiency. While verbal cueing has been shown to influence respiratory-swallow coordination in people with Parkinson's disease, its effect in individuals following head and neck cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of verbal cuing on respiratory-swallow coordination in this population. A prospective, with-in subjects' design was employed. Respiratory Inductance Plethysmography, nasal airflow and submental electromyograms were used to capture respiratory-swallow patterning, lung volume at swallow initiation (LVSI) and respiratory pause duration. Participants were verbally cued to swallow at four different points within tidal breathing: high inhalation, low inhalation, high exhalation, low exhalation. Non-cued swallow trials served as a control condition. Eighteen participants contributed a total of 360 analysable swallow trials. A significant increase was observed in optimal phasing (exhale-swallow-exhale) in the high inhalation and high exhalation cued conditions, compared to the non-cued condition OR [95% CI] = 4.74 [1.86, 12.09]; OR [95% CI] = 2.55 [1.11, 5.86] respectively. Verbal cueing significantly increased LVSI at low inhalation relative to non-cued swallows by 19%. In contrast, verbal cues at high and low exhalation significantly decreased LVSI, with mean decreases of 28% and 32%, respectively. This study shows that verbal cueing influences respiratory-coordination in individuals with head and neck cancer and suggests cuing at high inhalation is more likely to elicit optimal respiratory-swallow coordination (exhale-swallow-exhale pattern initiated at mid tidal lung volumes), highlighting the potential for introducing targeted cueing strategies to enhance respiratory-swallow coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42862345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.