ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Diagnostic Testing Is Not Associated with Patient Experience in Common Pediatric Cardiology Referrals.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe patient and family experience (PFE) scores for common new pediatric cardiology referrals and to evaluate whether the intensity of cardiac testing is associated with patient experience. We performed a retrospective study of PFE surveys completed following new outpatient pediatric cardiology visits at a single tertiary center from 2022 to 2023. Patients ≤ 18 years old referred for chest pain, palpitations, murmur, or dizziness/syncope were included. Survey domains included overall experience, provider respect, communication, and time spent with the provider. Responses were dichotomized, with top-box approach scores designated as 9-10 on a 0-10 Likert scale or a response of "yes, definitely." Additional variables included patient demographics, clinic location, referral-to-visit interval, cardiac testing performed and follow-up recommendations. Univariable and multivariable statistical analysis were used to identify factors associated with top-box scores. A total of 1293 surveys were analyzed. The performance of cardiac testing-including echocardiography, exercise stress testing, or ambulatory monitoring-was not associated with higher PFE scores. PFE scores also did not differ significantly by referral reason, clinic location, referral-to-visit interval, or follow-up recommendation. Overall PFE scores were high (91% in top-box category). Among common pediatric cardiology referrals, greater testing intensity was not associated with improved patient and family experience. These findings suggest that reducing non-essential testing may represent an opportunity to optimize resource utilization without negatively affecting perceived quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42862302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.