ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2026
Glass versus resin microspheres in ⁹⁰Y radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: toxicity patterns under uniform voxel-based dosimetry.
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare safety outcomes and toxicity patterns of glass and resin microspheres in patients undergoing yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), using uniform voxel-based dosimetry for both platforms and toxicity comparisons adjusted for treatment extent and tumor burden. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective single-center study included 103 consecutive patients with HCC and preserved liver function treated with ⁹⁰Y-TARE between June 2020 and June 2024 using glass-based (n = 70) or resin-based (n = 33) microspheres, selected according to routine practice and product availability. Absorbed doses for both cohorts were derived from voxel-based ⁹⁹ᵐTc-MAA SPECT/CT dosimetry. Adverse events (AEs) were graded with CTCAE version 5.0. The primary endpoint was overall AE incidence; secondary endpoints were specific toxicity patterns and dose-toxicity associations, examined with multivariable logistic regression adjusting for treatment extent and tumor volume. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared with the log-rank test.
resultsOverall AE incidence did not differ between glass and resin microspheres (glass 37.1% vs. resin 30.3%; p = 0.497), and all AEs were grade 1-2. Tumor and non-tumorous liver absorbed doses were similar. Bilirubin toxicity was more frequent with glass microspheres (glass 28.6% vs. resin 9.1%; p = 0.027), whereas hemoglobin decline was more common with resin microspheres (glass 10.0% vs. resin 30.3%; p = 0.010); both exploratory differences persisted after adjustment for treatment extent and tumor volume. Lung shunt fraction, a baseline patient-level parameter, was higher with resin (glass 2.6% vs. resin 4.1%; p = 0.043). Higher lung absorbed dose was associated with AE occurrence overall, without a significant lung dose × microsphere-type interaction (p = 0.41). Neither PFS (median, glass 9 vs. resin 12 months; p = 0.868) nor OS (glass 23 vs. resin 29 months; p = 0.929) differed significantly.
conclusionsGlass and resin microspheres showed no significant difference in overall AE incidence-without formally establishing equivalence-but differed in their patterns of mild laboratory toxicity independently of treatment extent and tumor burden. These exploratory findings support careful, individualized dosimetric assessment and require confirmation in prospective multicenter studies, but do not provide criteria for microsphere selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42862279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.