ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
Predicting the Risk of Distal Junctional Kyphosis After Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Preoperative Radiographic Indicators and Machine Learning.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo develop and internally validate an interpretable machine learning model using preoperative radiographic indicators to predict distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) after surgery for Lenke type 1 or 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).MethodsWe included 279 patients with Lenke type 1 or 2 AIS undergoing posterior spinal fusion, including 47 with DJK and 232 without DJK. Thirty-three preoperative variables were evaluated. The cohort was stratified 7:3 into training and internal hold-out validation sets. Feature selection and hyperparameter tuning were restricted to the training set. Boruta and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used for feature selection, and nine algorithms were compared.ResultsIn the internal hold-out validation set, support vector machine (SVM) had the numerically highest C-index (0.930; 95% CI, 0.867-0.992) versus logistic regression (0.912; 95% CI, 0.838-0.987). A paired DeLong test showed no statistically significant difference (difference, 0.017; 95% CI, -0.015 to 0.050; P = 0.292). SVM sensitivity was 0.857, specificity 0.843, precision 0.522, F1 score 0.649, and Brier score 0.073. Ten-fold nested cross-validation yielded a pooled C-index of 0.891 (95% CI, 0.826-0.948). SHAP identified TLK, LIV-SSV, and TK as dominant contributors.ConclusionsPreoperative sagittal alignment and the LIV-SSV relationship may aid exploratory DJK risk stratification. The three-feature SVM showed promising internal performance, but its numerical advantage over logistic regression does not establish superiority. External validation is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.