Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42861843›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2026

Site-Specific Characterization and Quantification of Facial Corticosteroid Addiction Dermatitis: A Multimodal Nomogram Integrating High-Frequency Ultrasonography and Transepidermal Water Loss.

Jun Wang, Ji Tao Gui, Rong Yu, Hai Rui Wang, Yang Hu, Ting Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun Wang *Department of Ultrasound, Nanxiang Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7563-5461
Ji Tao Gui *Department of Ultrasound, Nanxiang Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8459-3192
Rong Yu *Department of Ultrasound, Nanxiang Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7743-4296
Hai Rui WangDepartment of Dermatology, Ruijin Hospital, Nanxiang Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8467-7206
Yang HuDepartment of Dermatology, Ruijin Hospital, Nanxiang Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7454-8326
Ting LiDepartment of Dermatology, Ruijin Hospital, Nanxiang Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0009-7186

Funding

Key Discipline of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine JDZXYJHZDXK04Key Medical Discipline Construction Project of Jiading District Health System XK202406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evaluation of facial corticosteroid addiction dermatitis (FCAD) lacks objective criteria, and existing clinical evaluation methods largely ignore regional facial heterogeneity. This study aimed to develop a site-adjusted multimodal nomogram integrating 22-MHz high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) to serve as an adjunctive quantitative assessment tool to quantify the FCAD pathological state objectively. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective case-control study, 279 facial sites (119 lesional, 160 healthy) from 40 patients with FCAD and 40 healthy controls (HCs) were evaluated. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were employed to adjust for the intra-subject clustering effect of multisite data.

resultsMultivariable GEE identified four independent predictors for FCAD: marked blood flow on power Doppler imaging (PDI) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 19.46, p < 0.001), subepidermal low-echogenic band (SLEB) thickness (aOR = 1.76 per 0.01 mm increase, p = 0.005), TEWL (aOR = 1.11, p = 0.002), and the chin site (vs. forehead, aOR = 0.35, p = 0.009). The resulting nomogram achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.905, significantly outperforming a single-parameter vascular model (AUC = 0.821, p < 0.05). At the optimal probability cutoff, sensitivity was 85.7% and specificity was 86.9%.

conclusionIntegrating vascular, structural, and functional dimensions with anatomical site adjustments establishes a robust baseline for characterizing FCAD. This multimodal nomogram is intended for use as an adjunctive tool for quantitative assessment and disease monitoring, facilitating a critical shift from subjective clinical evaluation to precise, quantitative imaging.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesDermatitisFacial DermatosesNomogramsWater Loss, InsensibleAdultCase-Control StudiesFaceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyAdrenal Cortex HormonesFacial corticosteroid addiction dermatitisgeneralized estimating equationsnomogrampower Doppler imaging (PDI)regional heterogeneitysubepidermal low‐echogenic band (SLEB)topical corticosteroid withdrawaltransepidermal water loss (TEWL)

Identifiers

PMID42861843
PMCPMC13656343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.