Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42861830›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Stakeholder Perspectives on National Implementation of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation Before, During and After Pregnancy: A Policy Lab Study.

Linda van der Spek, Niek Mouter, Tessa Scheffers-van Schayck, Leonieke J Breunis, Hans van Kippersluis, Stijn Hooijman, Jasper V Been

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Linda van der SpekDivision of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0021-8603
Niek MouterDepartment of Engineering Systems and Services, Faculty of Technology Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0299-5852
Tessa Scheffers-van SchayckDepartment of Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Leonieke J BreunisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7788-6511
Hans van KippersluisErasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3297-5059
Stijn HooijmanErasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3139-9472
Jasper V BeenDivision of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4907-6466

Funding

Convergence | Healthy Start HSF24_7Erasmus Initiative Smarter Choices for Better Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinancial incentives can substantially increase effectiveness of smoking cessation support for pregnant women, their partners, people planning a pregnancy, and parents, yet implementation in routine care remains limited. This study explored how incentives could be implemented within a national cessation programme through collaboration with key stakeholders.

methodsA Policy Lab approach was used to collaboratively identify barriers, opportunities, and policy directions for implementation. Two interactive sessions were held in autumn 2024 with representatives of the Dutch Ministry of Health, the National Health Care Institute, health insurers, researchers, healthcare professionals, a smoking cessation support provider, and a parent. Transcripts and exercise outputs were thematically analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). As part of the policy lab process, we developed a policy brief, infographic, and explainer video.

resultsKey challenges included limited public and political support, legal and financial barriers, and logistical and design-related issues. Participants recommended clear messaging on health and societal benefits; initiating pilot projects and providing clear insight into the costs, benefits, and timing of returns; and integrating incentives into existing cessation programme structures with accessible and feasible design.

conclusionThis study provides practical guidance for policymakers and health insurers to integrate financial incentives into smoking cessation support for (expectant) parents, while offering transferable insights for implementation in other settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A parent with lived experience of receiving smoking cessation support with incentives participated in the Policy Lab. In addition, healthcare professionals, smoking cessation programme providers, health insurers, and representatives from public bodies contributed perspectives grounded in their roles representing patient and public interests. These inputs informed the development of recommendations and dissemination materials, including the policy brief and explainer video, to enhance relevance, accessibility, and public acceptability.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMotivationSmoking CessationStakeholder ParticipationFemaleHumansNetherlandsPregnancyfinancial incentivesimplementationparentspolicy labpregnancysmoking cessationstakeholder perspectives

Identifiers

PMID42861830
PMCPMC13656341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.