ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
Development of Custodial Staff Modifiers for Safewards Secure-Custodial Mental Health.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safewards is a nursing model of care designed for acute mental health inpatient units. Since inception, the model has gained popularity in many countries and has been implemented in settings other than mental health. A version for bed-based mental health units within prisons has also been developed to assist nurses working in this complex setting called Safewards Secure-Custodial Mental Health. A previous study identified that modifiers (things staff can do to prevent conflict and containment) were needed for custodial staff to finalise the prison model. The aim of this study was to develop custodial staff modifiers for the adapted model known as Safewards Secure-Custodial Mental Health. To inform the modifiers a literature review was first conducted. A Nominal Group Technique was then used to seek feedback and reach consensus on the proposed custodial staff modifiers. Participants (n = 15) included custodial officers, forensic mental health nurses, allied health and lived experience workers. Consensus was reached on the custodial staff modifiers after suggestions from the NGT were incorporated. Data were thematically analysed and three themes were interpreted: (1) Complexity with clashes in paradigms (custodial versus clinical); (2) You are a 'Care Bear': Ostracised for demonstrating care and concern; (3) Meeting in the middle (to work collaboratively). There was support for the implementation of Safewards Secure-Custodial Mental Health. Future research should consider the interventions for the custodial model with reference to contextual factors in a prison setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.