ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2026
A rapid and efficient in planta assay for assessment of RNA editing factor performance.
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Land plant mitochondria and plastids are endosymbiotic organelles that possess their own, reduced genomes. Gene expression is largely regulated at the transcript level, predominantly by nuclear-encoded proteins. Notably, up to thousands of cytidines in organellar RNAs are specifically edited to uridines, mostly restoring conserved genetic information. Key players in this process are nuclear-encoded pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins, which bind target RNAs in a one-PPR:one-nucleotide manner, following a two-amino-acid-based code. Cytidine deamination is catalyzed by intrinsic or trans-acting DYW domains. The modularity and programmability of PPR-RNA interactions make PPR editing factors attractive candidates for the development of biotechnological tools. However, RNA target selection is not determined by the 'PPR code' alone, hampering the generation of highly effective and specific editors. Refining such tools requires efficient assays to dissect the determinants of editor-RNA interaction. Here, we introduce a rapid assay to assess PPR editor specificity through transient expression in the cytosol of Nicotiana benthamiana, which offers a large and diverse transcriptome that enables extensive off-target editing. Profiling of these off-targets provides comprehensive information on an editor's target selectivity. Compared with a previous setup in the model moss Physcomitrium patens, which relies on stable transformation, the required experimental time is reduced from months to days. We demonstrate the power of the system by characterizing the off-targets of the moss editor PpPPR56. The new assay allows rapid functional assessment of editing factor variants and removes a bottleneck in understanding editor-RNA interactions, which is a prerequisite for the rational improvement of PPR-based RNA editing tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.