ArticleMusculoskeletal care2026
Evolution of Outcome Assessment in Chronic Low Back Pain Clinical Trials Throughout the 20th and 21st Centuries: A Scoping Review.
Article in Musculoskeletal care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify, map, and synthesise the outcomes reported in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and describe how these outcomes have changed over time throughout the 20th and 21st centuries.
methodsA scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PEDro, and Google Scholar) were searched for clinical trials published between 1975 and 2025. Five independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and categorised reported outcomes into conceptually related domains. Outcomes and measurement instruments were synthesised descriptively and narratively according to four chronological periods.
resultsA total of 708 clinical trials met the eligibility criteria. Pain intensity remained the only outcome consistently reported throughout the entire study period. Over time, outcome assessment progressively expanded to include disability, physical function, physical performance, psychological health, quality of life, work-related outcomes, sleep, fatigue, physical activity, healthcare utilization, and patient-reported outcomes. Measurement instruments also evolved from predominantly symptom-oriented scales to standardized multidimensional questionnaires and, more recently, objective digital technologies. Overall, outcome assessment shifted from a predominantly biomedical approach toward comprehensive biopsychosocial evaluation.
conclusionsOutcome assessment in CLBP clinical trials has undergone a marked conceptual evolution over the past 5 decades. These findings support the adoption of standardized, multidimensional, and patient-centred outcome frameworks to improve the methodological quality, comparability, and clinical relevance of future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.