ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Superior oat (
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating forage genotypes is crucial for mitigating nutritional deficiencies and optimizing production in tropical small horn systems. This study investigated the effects of incorporating different Avena sativa genotypes (5526A, SRCPX80AB2806, and 5527A) into total mixed rations on nutrient intake, apparent digestibility, growth performance, and economic returns in yearling Bonga lambs under specific experimental conditions. Thirty intact male yearling lambs were assigned to three dietary treatments in a randomized complete block design over a 90-day feeding trial. The diets were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous (18.5% crude protein and 10.34 MJ/kg metabolizable energy). The results demonstrated that genotype 5527A (Treatment 3) significantly improved dry matter intake, apparent digestibility, and average daily gains compared to the other evaluated genotypes. Specifically, lambs on the 5527A-based diet exhibited superior average daily gains and enhanced feed conversion efficiency. Furthermore, partial budget analysis indicated higher net economic returns under the conditions of this trial. However, these findings are limited to the specific breed, forage management practices, and production system evaluated. While these results highlight the potential of utilizing superior forage genotypes to improve smallholder productivity, further multi-environment evaluations are necessary before broader generalizations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.